The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two pie charts illustrate the comparison of different kinds of energy production ...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d remain percentage other was the lowest 4,90%. On the other hand in 2005, percen...
^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...10,10% also percentage other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: meanwhile,
...10,10% also percentage other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge other got 9,10%. meanwhile percentage the comparison of different kinds of ene...
^^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... petro position minus -9,72%. The middle nuclear got 3,7% after that the percenta...
^^
Line 4, column 712, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... different kind of energy production in the remain goal got 1,13% and partisicomment gas g...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24223602484 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64043104152 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509316770186 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1574385624 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187989563684 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171186453174 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.237553578162 0.0843802449381 282% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255234688507 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.300400480926 0.0819641961636 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.