The pie chart provided here gives information about the various ways of energy production adopted by France in year 1995 and 2005 respectively.
Firstly, to start with the resources of energy, five different types of energy sources have been utilized over the past, namely Coal, Gas, Petro, Nuclear and some other. Secondly, if we see the percentage of production, Coal and Natural Gas were among the most preferable ones and the production of Nuclear and other resources have been in certain limits over these years.
In terms of comparison between the two years, In year 1995 the production of coal and natural gas was about 29.80% and 29.63% respectively while that in year 2005 remains at 30.93% and 30.31% with a slight increase of about 1%.Production of petro can be seen as 29.27% and 19.55% and nuclear power as 6.40% and 10.10% in the following years. Thus, it can clearly be interpreted that with the increasing consumption, the production of energy has also increased in the same amount over the past years.
- The environment problem facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what ex 67
- Today large shopping center and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC 71
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73837209302 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50004732243 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 172.0 22.4926829268 765% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 815.0 112.824112599 722% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 172.0 22.9334400587 750% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 74.0 5.23603664747 1413% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277875275168 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.277875275168 0.103423049105 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193024086257 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601458392528 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 86.9 13.2329268293 657% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -86.18 61.2550243902 -141% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.0 10.3012195122 660% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.4 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.29 8.06136585366 190% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 70.8 10.9970731707 644% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.