The environment problem facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what ex

The world would be a chaos if we keep exploiting the natural resources at the same rate. This damage is so huge that general people can do very little to improve the situation, while few people believe that only government and large companies are responsible to make a difference. In my opinion, the small efforts made by people can ultimately be a good example to tackle down the situation.

To begin with, In some developing countries, the citizens are well aware about their duties towards environment hence they involving themselves in improving the surrounding eco system. The success of any idea depends upon its foundation, as, in order to work for waste management the first step would be knowing about the domestic waste categorization. To exemplify, If we see the situation of Indore; a big city in central part of India, the government scheme of "Swachch Bharat" is successful because of the keen participation of its residents. As the people separated the organic and non-organic waste, it was easier for government officials to implement further step for its proper decomposition.

Furthermore, sometimes, the government does its part however the success of the plan depends upon, how well it has been executed by the people. Like in Germany, the government has established e-waste management booths and have skilled people to repair their non functioning gadgets, which will eventually reduce the e-waste for the country. From here on, the responsibility lies on the shoulders of the citizens to make this program a big hit.

To conclude, as per aforementioned examples, both Government and citizens have to play their part to reduce the damages being done to mother nature. Things can not be done alone by any of the parties; every little steps adds to the final result.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...r waste management the first step would be knowing about the domestic waste categorization...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...er step for its proper decomposition Furthermore sometimes the government does its part ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, while, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01694915254 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82136959657 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 295.0 20.2975951904 1453% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1480.0 106.682146367 1387% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 295.0 20.7667163134 1421% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 85.0 7.06120827912 1204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275222249715 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275222249715 0.084324248473 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15942313787 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823015627879 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 149.7 13.0946893788 1143% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -227.95 50.2224549098 -454% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 118.3 11.3001002004 1047% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.32 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.91 8.58950901804 255% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 120.0 10.1190380762 1186% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.