The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The mentioned two pie charts demonstrate the proportion of five kinds of energy generation in two different years 1995 and 2005 of France.
In general, as is represented by the pie charts, gas and coal contributed the highest percentage of energy production whereas other accounted for the lowest ratio in both years.
In 1995,gas and coal had ratios of 29.63% and 29.80% respectively which had approximately increased by 0.1% in 2005.On the other hand, others even though had increased by 5% in 2005 compared to mere 4.90% in 1995 still remained the lowest overhead among the energy generation.
In 1995,petrol had ratio of 29.27% of total production which had significantly dropped by 10% in 2005 . In addition, the nuclear energy, although had increased by nearly 4% had the second lowest contribution in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-14 | priynnk1663 | 73 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...approximately increased by 0.1% in 2005.On the other hand, others even though had ...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...had significantly dropped by 10% in 2005 . In addition, the nuclear energy, althou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, still, whereas, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 696.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90419496978 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9890312878 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175249305799 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114648973877 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113329653228 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136411598041 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117243897655 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.