The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The mentioned table diagram demonstrates the total number of visitors to Ashdown museum before and after the renovation whereas the pie charts reveal the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the similar two periods.
Overall, the number of visitors increased significantly after the reconstruction of the museum where there were equal numbers of satisfied as well as dissatisfied visitors in the museum when they were asked to give their opinions in the surveys.
It is clear from the table diagram that the number of visitors increased sharply from 7400 to 92000 after the maintenance of Ashdown museum.
According to the pie charts, we can say that the percentage of very satisfied visitors increased by 20% and reached 35% after refurbishment. Similarly, while observing the satisfied visitors declined from 10 to 5% after repairment. In addition, there was a strong decrement in the ratio of dissatisfied visitors by 25% and reached 15% after reconstruction .However, the rate of very dissatisfied visitors increased significantly by 10% from 30 to 40% after the renovation .Moreover, the percentage of no response visitors remained stable even after the repairment of the museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...25% and reached 15% after reconstruction .However, the rate of very dissatisfied v...
^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...% and reached 15% after reconstruction .However, the rate of very dissatisfied visitors...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 10% from 30 to 40% after the renovation .Moreover, the percentage of no response ...
^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...0% from 30 to 40% after the renovation .Moreover, the percentage of no response visitors...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emained stable even after the repairment of the museum.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, similarly, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39690721649 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99358526998 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9898984101 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.5 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 5.23603664747 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414478060704 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222198559746 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155282354843 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288139958581 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154181838737 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.