The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The mentioned pie charts illustrate the data of the population of Yemen and Italy according to the age group in 2000 and prediction after fifty years.

Overall, as is represented by the pie charts, in the beginning of the year children were dominant in Yemen, while middle age group accounted the highest proportion in Italy. However, in future, it is forecasted that middle age people are going to have the largest population in both Italy and Yemen.

It is evident that during 2000 children’s accounted more than half of total population (60.1%), but it is going to be plunged by approximately 24% in 2050. Likewise, the age range of 15-59 years and 60+ years had a figure of 46.3% and 3.6 respectively in 2000, whereas it has been already claimed the former will surge spectacularly and will reach 57.3 %, while the latter will have a mere increase of only around 3% by 2050 in Yemen.

However, in Italy, the population of 15-59 had a significantly large ratio (61.6%), but it will encounter the sharp decrease of 15 %, although decrement will be observed, but it will remain dominant in future also. In contrast, children had a ratio of only 14.3%, which will gradually diminish and reach 11.5%. In addition, 60+ people had a percentage of nearly a quarter of the total population, while it is projected that it will witness the considerable escalation and will obtain a ratio of 42.3%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e highest proportion in Italy. However, in future, it is forecasted that middle age peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., but it will remain dominant in future also. In contrast, children had a ratio of o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87029288703 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77475180917 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535564853556 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4116816654 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133157213042 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691058433106 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577256823803 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104262685777 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057662663039 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.