The pie charts compare the percentage of the different equipment users to watch TV in Canada in two years (2009 and 2019).
Overall, the proportion of people who watch TV programs on the conventional TV, laptop, and desktop computer decreased, by contrast the amount of these people who use the mobile phone, tablet, and the flat-screen TV increased in this period (between 2009 and 2019). If in 2009 the conventional TV was the most favorite device, in 2019 it became the least popular equipment.
The most significant drop was the number of people who watch TV on conventional TV, from over a third in 2009 to 4% in 2019. In this period, the percentage of viewers who watch the television program on the laptop and desktop computer fell down, too. It dropped from about 20% to over 10%.
The opposite trend can be seen when we look at the charts, if in 2009 the proportion of the viewers who watch TV on the flat-screen TV was only under 10%, in 2019 the percentage of these viewers was the highest, it was under 30%. And the increase of the number of the viewer on the tablet was biggest, it rose about four times from 5% in 2009 to 19% in 2019. The rise from 15% to 26% was the number of viewers watch TV on the tablet in this period.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 42
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp 67
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nventional TV, from over a third in 2009 to 4% in 2019. In this period, the perce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41484716157 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43334513609 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449781659389 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9734988711 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844402526672 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485523928054 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666700308218 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886160760542 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801448751496 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.