The pie charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate how distinctively individuals in 3 nations studied English in 2010 and 2015
Overall, it can be observed that going to English class in the evening were most advocated contemporarily. Also, there was no cases of studying abroad in country C untill 2015
In 2010, the most favourite options of learning English was going to evening class. Specifically, around 70% of English students went to this class in country A and B, and remarkably 94% in country C. Besides, studying abroad is an option that attacted approximately a quarter of them in country A and B. Conversely, in 2010, abroad learning was chosen by none of the English students in country C. Furthermore, online classes were the least popular decision in 2010, with the percentages around 5 to 8%.
After a 5-year period, although there were some certain shifts in the method of studying English, evening class was still evaluated as the most renowned way. However, it witnessed a downward tendency with a drop of 3%, 12% and 24% respectively in country A, B and C. Noticeably, the abroad method was remained sustainably as around 20-23% in country A and country B, with a small increase of 3% in the other one. Whereas, there is a fourfold increase to 32% in studying online in country B, and a slight rise in country A and C, respectively 10% and 15%
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- punished 67
- Today food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers Why is this so Is this a positive or negative trend 67
- The pie charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations studied English in 2010 and 2015 Overall, it can be observed that going t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82403433476 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87807843575 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.589324242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181123038307 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810187328972 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534960499266 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134593268373 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647818081418 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations studied English in 2010 and 2015 Overall, it can be observed that going t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82403433476 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87807843575 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.589324242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181123038307 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810187328972 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534960499266 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134593268373 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647818081418 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.