The pie graph illustrates the percentage of 5 major elements had an impact on the choice of UK colleges of students in 1987/2007.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately clear that there were upward trends in the proportion of 3 reasons( Suitable degree courses, which hold the lion’s share of the total, Close to parental home, and Quality of teaching) while the two remainders went down significantly in both two years.
In 1987, the appropriate degree sources were the largest factor, accounting for more than a third of the total( 35%). In addition, over two decides, that keeper to gain more popularity, reaching exactly at 37%. Furthermore, this pattern can be seen at Near home reason and Quality of teaching reason. In particular, the ahead made up 22% in 2007, twice as high as its proportion in the part. The remainder witnessed a slight increase of 3%, from 15%.
By contrast, the rate of the reason for sports and activities experienced a sharp decline, dropping to 19% to 6%, more than three times. The second rank in previous time belonged to Quality of resources reason, which occupied about one in four the total( 21%), but 20 years later, it decreased gradually by 4%, flowing both three elements in the above paragraph.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999. 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 78
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, that keeper to gain more popularity, reaching exactly at 37%. Furthermore, th...
^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three elements in the above paragraph.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, second, so, third, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86320754717 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69743278793 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669811320755 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9303257508 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164060097762 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627328615029 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556806545294 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101619438584 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640898898047 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.