The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

<!--break-->The pie charts illustrate a consumption of water used by several continents and how much of it is used for specific occasions.

<!--break-->The main features if each chart contain the percentage of industrial, agricultural and domestic using of water.

<!--break-->According to the charts, the most popular type of using of water in Africa, South America, Central Asia and South East Asia is agricultural use. It is estimated from 71 to 88 percent respectively, which is much more than figures in Europe and North America.
<!--break-->On the other hand, consumption of water for industrial purposes show the highest percentage in North America and Europe, which are 48 and 53 accordingly. These values are much more higher than in other four areas of the world, where Central Asia has the lowest percentage of 5.
<!--break-->At the same time, domestic use of water in North America, Europe and South America vary slightly for 3 percent with values 13, 15 and 19 accordingly. In contrast with them, figures in Asian areas and in Africa do not reach a 10 percent and are estimated with 7 and 9 percents.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 188, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...d 53 accordingly. These values are much more higher than in other four areas of the world, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...th values 13, 15 and 19 accordingly. In contrast with them, figures in Asian areas and i...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, so, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11956521739 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24343163505 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.8812075885 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208340836108 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995600183769 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645231767956 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13434019248 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611234825084 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.