The pie charts compare the figure of electricity produced using five different sources of fuel in two countries over two separate years.
Overall, the total electricity production in both countries increased over that period. While coal was the most vital source to generate energy in Australia, most electricity in France in 2000 was from nuclear power.
In Australia,100 units of electricity was produced in 1980, a half of which was from coal. Natural gas and Hydropower were responsible for the production of equal amounts of electricity, with 20 units, being double the figure for oil. After two decades, the total production of electricity increased to 170 units, and coal still kept the top position, at 130 units while the other figures were trivial.
In France, less electricity was created than in Australia,exactly at 90 units in the same year, and the quantities of it generated from natural gas or coal were equal, at 25 units, compared to 20 units produced from oil.This was followed by a sharp upward trend at 180 units, being double for 1980.Since 1980, the chart shows a sharp decrease in natural gas.Meanwhile nuclear power started to increase sharply and became most popular in 2000
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025 11
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the honey bee Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information abouth the percentage of population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , exactly
...lectricity was created than in Australia,exactly at 90 units in the same year, and the q...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... compared to 20 units produced from oil.This was followed by a sharp upward trend at...
^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...end at 180 units, being double for 1980.Since 1980, the chart shows a sharp decrease ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...t shows a sharp decrease in natural gas.Meanwhile nuclear power started to increase sharp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...t shows a sharp decrease in natural gas.Meanwhile nuclear power started to increase sharp...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08585858586 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82877430795 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.633136874 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.857142857 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19408663597 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09785194904 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385467678611 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129626296641 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153448667593 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.