The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The presented tables depict information about sales prices of Fairtrade*-labelled farm products, namely pineapples and tea in five different countries within two separate years, 2010 and 2015. Units are measured millions of euros (m).
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that Austria was the best seller of both tea and pineapples among these countries in 2010. By 2015, Austria experienced a significant growth in selling pineapples and remained the best sale record, whereas in terms of tea figure France surpassed Austria and became the top seller of the tea product.
When observing the first table in more detail, we can see that in 2010, the most significant tea sales, 4 million (4m) euros were reported in Austria, and they doubled in 2015. The figure for the Netherlands was originally 50% lower than that for Austria (2m) while sales in France were slightly higher (1.8m). However, while the former remained relatively stable, the latter rose dramatically to 21m. There was little difference between the figures for Germany 2.8m) and Norway (1.8m), and both experienced slight increases to 3m and 2m, respectively.
Austria had the highest pineapple sales in both years, as they rose exactly threefold from 16 million euros to 48m. The Netherlands sales were almost as high as those of France in 2010 (1.6 and 2m, respectively) and both surged, reaching 5 and 5.6m. There was little difference between the figures for Norway and Germany (2 and 1.8m, respectively), and both witnessed a downward trend to reach point of nearly 2m.
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 73
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 78
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15476190476 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76938641829 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2376644069 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.090909091 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234263952696 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089063187329 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119175105068 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174640852891 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128276246406 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.