The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The change in electricity production using five various fuel sources in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000 is displayed by the bar charts, shown in units.
Overall, Frenc did not use the nuclear power. However, the rate of oil consumption decreased in all nation, and other sources showed some trends.
Initially, the coal use to produce electricity in Australia had been higher at 50 units than that in France at a half of the former. Furthermore, the unit of natural gases in France consumed had been 25, being bigger than that of Australia’s, with a gap of 5 units. Then, other fuels in both states were below 25 units.
Eventually, the figure for hydro power and coal in France increased to 36 and 130 units, running, but that for other resources showed a reverse to be under 5. In the counterpart, an upward trend was experienced in nuclear power and oil by 111 units and 5, respectively, while the units of coal usage were as same as in 1980. This is contrasted to the previous figures, the rest resources decrease to below 5 units
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many countries spend a lot of money to make bicycles easier Why Is it the best solution for transport problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...howed some trends. Initially, the coal use to produce electricity in Australia had...
^^^
Line 4, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rest resources decrease to below 5 units
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67027027027 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66434400918 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9159385051 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340461083333 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120659240456 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926664540422 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194023686097 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105596370657 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.