The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The four given pie charts compares and contrasts data on the changes in the amount of electricity produced by five different fuel sources in Australia and France over a twenty-one-year period from 1980 to 2000.
A general look at the four diagrams highlights the fact that the total electricity production in Australia and France increased over the mentioned period. Besides, electricity was generated from more sources in France than in Australia.
Getting back to the details, France's total production experienced a twofold increase, from 90 units in 1980 to 180 units in 2000, and thus surpassed that of Australia. Besides, in 2000, while electricity in Australia mainly came from coal with the statistic of 130 units, the majority of France's electricity was created thanks to nuclear power with the figure of 126 units. It is also worth noting that the statistics of electricity generated from coal in France in both 1980 and 2000 were exactly the same with the number of 25 units.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- TOEFL essay How do movies or television influence people s behavior Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 73
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06134969325 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78446516668 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4224783183 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294641957211 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156264205189 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447999714714 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207010331583 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224448905817 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.