The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Given are the four pie charts delineating the fuel electricity units manufactured in Australia and France in a period of 20 years, commencing from 1980.
Perceptibly, coal was the favorite fuel source in Australians, while nuclear power was recorded to consume the most in France in a period of 20 years.
When it comes to the electricity units by fuel source in Australia, in 1980, the amount of coal was recorded accounting for a half of total production. Following that was hydro power which had the same value as natural gas with 20 units and oil was the least using fuel source with 10 units. Meanwhile, coal had a remarkable leap with 130 units of fuel in 2000. Simultaneously, 36 units was the energy number that hydro power swelled while natural gas and oil diminished merely 2 units in the last year.
In 1980, nuclear power was registered as a majority power energy in France that didn't appear in Australia. Natural gas and coal had a similar number with 25 units which was followed by oil and nuclear power in 5 units less with 20 and 15 units in sequence and 5 units came from hydro power. In the next 20 decades, nuclear power ratcheted up with 126 units along with the soaring of oil with 25 units. Woefully, natural gas and hydro power both gargantuan shrunk to merely 2 units electricity while coal remained with 25 units in the last year shown.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the four pie charts delineating the fue...
^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al gas and oil diminished merely 2 units in the last year. In 1980, nuclear pow...
^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... a majority power energy in France that didnt appear in Australia. Natural gas and co...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61728395062 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54560596703 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2158898595 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174122463687 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100292995242 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656393701336 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145155872495 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710029823066 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.