The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the four pie charts contrasting the figure of electricity units generated by five distinct fuel sources in Australia and France in 2 disparate years: 1980 and 2000.
Perceptibly, coal was employed the most in Australia to produce electricity while nuclear power was by far the most prevalent source of fuel used by France over the years.
In Australia, 50 units of electricity were produced by coal in the year 1980, while natural gas and hydropower contributed a corresponding part of 20 units, which was half higher than the figure made by oil. However, after 2 decades, the disproportion in units generated by these fuel sources was greater when 130 units were recorded by coal, followed by 36 units from hydropower. Meanwhile, merely 2 units of the aggregate were produced by oil and natural gas.
Strikingly, France took advantage of nuclear power in manufacturing electricity, which was not registered in Australia. This source also achieved an exponential leap in the figure of electricity produced from only 15 in the first year to 126 in 2000. Conversely, an opposite pattern was documented in the units made by hydropower and natural gas when the figure diminished greatly to only 2 from 5 and 25 units respectively. Astonishingly, coal and oil both ranked second in producing electricity in France over the mentioned years with identically 25 units recorded in 2000.
- The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 11
- Some people believe that a home country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the four pie charts contrasting the fig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10087719298 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01002160637 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6914071341 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226602694439 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109225526063 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786035623832 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174412636366 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829489859899 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.