The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied pie charts enumerate the generation of an electricity by using different fuels in two different countries in 1980 and 2000. The highlighting feature is that the production of an electricity in both the countries is doubled after 20 years.
As it is observed from the data, nearly 50 units of an electricity was produced by the usage of coal in 1980 in Australia whereas in 2000, anew, coal was on the supreme position to produce the electricity with 130 units. The feeblest fuel source used in 1980 was oil in Australia, which produces only 10 units of an electricity.
To continue with, in France, coal and natural gas was on alike rank to generate electricity with 25 units whereas hydro power contributes the niggling with 5 units in 1980. The maximum electricity in 2000 was produced by nuclear power with 126 units.
While analysing overall, coal produced the paramount units of an electricity in 1980 in Australia whereas the gutter electricity is generated by oil and natural gas in France in 2000.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays young people prefer going to shopping centres rather than spending their time in organised activities such as sports and music. Do you think its a positive or negative development. 56
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.Write a report 73
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90804597701 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81365129986 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1408668301 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23018346474 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124882858929 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047887842523 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156084617273 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352791698538 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.