The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.

The pie charts illustrate the fuel source of electricity in two Western countries in the years 1980 and 2000. At first glance, it is clear that total production of electricity in France and Australia increased by nearly two times from 1980 to 2000. Electricity in Australia was produced from coal, hydro power, oil and natural gas while in France, electricity not only depended on these sources but also on nuclear power.

For details, the main source of electricity in Australia was coal. In 1980, 80% of electricity production was from coal, this amount in the last year of 20th century rosed up to over three quarters. The second preferred source was hydro power with around a fifth of total production. Australia also produced electricity from oil and natural gas. However, these units were very small and had a significant drop. (20 units from gas in 1980 dropped at 2 units in 2000, 10 units from oil fell down to 2 units in 2000).

In contrast, in the years 1980 in France, the main source was coal and natural gas, each source had almost a third of total production. This rate remained unchanged in 2000. However, there was a huge change in the production by nuclear power. It became the main source of electricity. In 1980, only 15 units among 90 units were from nuclear power but in 2000, two third of production relied on this source.

In conclusion, each country had a different way to produce electricity, however, Australia almost used coal whereas France used nuclear power in 2000.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 73 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 56 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 56 view
2019-11-14 junjunh 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Anh_nguyen :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts were very small and had a significant drop. 20 units from gas in 1980 dropped ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81081081081 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56847024513 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467181467181 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3646710214 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0666666667 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275244489403 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11083219005 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065398563476 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183022070014 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700948739229 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.