Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
It is argument that there should be similar number of men and women in each subject at universities. I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, equal numbers if men and women in every discipline bring many advantages. Firstly, there will be effective support in class activities. The decisiveness of men combined with the delicateness from women brings out many effective ideas. For instance, in Business plan class, male students will find reckless way to break into a market while taking the needs of customers into consideration is a strong ability of female students. Secondly, male and female student will have countless opportunities to build communication skills. Working with people from different locations, different genders allows them to gain more valuable experience than only co-operating with only men or women. Because men and women usually have different points of view.
On the other hand, in some situations, it is difficult to keep balanced numbers of students by gender in a major. First, people choose majors based on their abilities and favourite. Many persons will not have a chance to study their wanted subjects if universities also choose students by gender. Second, some subjects are suitable for men rather than women and vice versa. For example, more women choose nursing class than men. Because this work requires carefulness and attention to details at which character most woment are usually better than men. As a result, it is hard to see the balanced numbers of male and female students.
In conclusion, while I support the idea that universities should approve balanced gender in every major, however, in some special subjects, it is hard to keep equal numbers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-28 | Anh_nguyen | 67 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to sience and technology. Discuss both these views a 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rate between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some peple say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The maps show two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to nurse'.
Suggestion: to nurse
...e versa. For example, more women choose nursing class than men. Because this work requi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... carefulness and attention to details at which character most woment are usually ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21660649819 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72507465557 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5777921825 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176417539236 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597885833885 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564417890185 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120527958755 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148416581477 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.