The pie charts compare the amount of electricity produced using five different fuel sources in two countries in 1980 and 2000.
It is clear that the total amount of electricity production increased dramatically in both the countries from 1980 to 2000. Overall, coal and nuclear power were the main sources of fuel in Australia and France respectively.
In 1980, coal was used to produce 50 out of 100 units of electricity in Australia, rose to 130 out of 170 units by the year of 2000. In contrast, nuclear power was widely used as a fuel source in France in 2000, produced almost 70% of the country's electricity.
France produced 25 units of electricity by using coal in 1980, and remained at a similar level in 2000. While oil was used to produce 20 units of electricity in 1980, but this figure rose to 25 units by the year of 2000. On the other hand, in Australia, the figure for oil fell from 10 units to 2 units at the end of the period.
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Discuss the problems and Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities. 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l in Australia and France respectively. In 1980, coal was used to produce 50 out...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52023121387 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59458386159 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479768786127 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.5210405346 43.030603864 27% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.75 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30613494341 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156463621827 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419053570957 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214127713925 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268219280782 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.