The pie charts compare the expenditure of a school in the UK in three
different years over a 20-year period.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of expenditures in five different sectors with respect to a school in the UK over a period of 3 decades from 1981 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over a period as a whole, the major proportion of investment went for teachers' salaries. However, investment in the insurance sector witnessed a slight upward trend over time.
According to the given illustration, during the first decade, teachers' salaries rose to 50% from 40% in 1991. Also, whilst resources accounted for a fifth of the total(up by 5%), with merely a 1% increase, insurance made up 3% of the overall expenditure. However, other workers' salaries and furniture equipment observed a sharp plunge of nearly 6% and 10% respectively by the period end.
Turning to 2001, despite a 5% decline, teachers' salaries constituted a major part of the total expenditure. Besides, whereas other workers' salaries continued to decline(22% down to 15%), by contrast, resources, and furniture's budget kept fluctuating, reaching 9% and 23% respectively.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 78
- Some people prefer to directly help or support people who need it in the local community however others prefer to give money to national or international charities Discuss both views and give your own opinion Write at least 250 words 89
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- Some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in while others believe countryside is the right choice Discuss both views give your own opinion and examples 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03746370475 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0462992479 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154603698419 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645802910248 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117139316775 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116257960822 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147833933849 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.