Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on your health and on society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this revolutionary world, day by day new technological innovations is emerging out, which claim to be of immense value at global levels. The invention of mobile phones is one of such revolution that has changed the way of living to a greater extent. It is often suggested that certain limits should be imposed by the government bodies to curb the colossal demand and utilization of mobile phones, while many others argue that this modern advancement has become an indispensable part of daily life and hence should not be restricted at any point of time. I am at discord with the given statement and think that a balanced approach should be followed to avail all the benefits without getting negatively impacted by its overuse.
It is generally believed that over-dependency on technological devices may have certain pros and cons. For instance, mobile phones are gaining huge popularity among teenagers and young children, and as per many experts, it can have a bad influence on their brain development. Moreover, the frequency of the radio waves emitted by phones can interfere with sensitive equipment in hospitals and airplanes resulting in a major disaster. Hence, looking at the numerous problems, it is usually expected that the government should come in action to grapple this rising issue.
On the contrary, it is claimed that this modern era is a boon in the context of the mobile revolution. As phones play a vital role in our day to day life. For example, due to the availability of various apps such as banking, shopping, and health within the same handy system, it has become extremely easy to maintain daily transactions without much hassle. In addition, handling different jobs, and businesses while sitting in remote areas has reduced many challenges. So, it is an undeniable fact that if handled properly, this innovation can be of extreme value in today's busy lifestyle.
To conclude, although there are serious threats of using mobile phones, its demand is surging at a dramatic rate. It is a point of moot whether the Government should react on this rising dependency or not. In my opinion, an intelligent and careful approach is needed while enjoying the overall gains from this stupendous invention.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places that are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 92
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 84
- British Emigration to selected destinations from 2004 2007 presented in a bar chart 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the context of the mobile revolution. As phones play a vital role in our day to ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ains from this stupendous invention.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07588075881 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83217410923 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588075880759 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.209685518 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161033306635 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497472161712 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365500757947 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971411694266 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282979369403 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.