The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The pie chart depicts the information about modes of getting news by Canadian and Australian citizens such as TV, radio, print, online.

To begin with, In Canada as well as in Australia most people love to watch the news on television. 40% of the Canadian population alongside 37% of Australian people accessing news through the tv. On the other hand, online news is the most popular source in Australia because 52% of citizens using it of getting the news. In Canada, 36% of people watch the news online.

Moreover, although radio and print news are also used in both countries, just 7% and 2% of people are interested in accessing news through radio respectively and 14% people are using print sources of news in both countries. It is the extremely lowest ratio in Canada as well as in Australia.

Overall, most of the people used updated sources to get news likewise tv and online because it is extremely convenient on the other hand, a traditional method like print tv are getting the lowest rating in both countries.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'extremely the lowest'.
Suggestion: extremely the lowest
...es of news in both countries. It is the extremely lowest ratio in Canada as well as in Australia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, moreover, so, well, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83615819209 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57382925206 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1594994666 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163337492826 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943753350632 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327300855313 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109325921272 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531682526774 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.