The two pie charts tell us the proportion of getting news from different sources of two distinct nations: Canada and Australia.
Looking more closely at the charts, it is evident from the data that TV and Online sources were the most used sources for getting the news. In contrast, Radio and other sources were the less used sources.
On the one hand, TV was the most used source in Canada, and It was 40%. In comparison, other sources were less used, and It was 3%. Online was the second most used source(36%). Whereas Print and Radio were not so common for news and they were 14% and 7% respectively.
On the other hand, Online was the most used source for getting news in Australia and, It was a little more than a half (52%). While Radio and Other sources were less used and They were 2%. TV was the second most used source, and It was at 37%. Print and Radio were also not standard like Canada, and Print was used by only 7% for getting the news.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37640449438 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04720365319 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438202247191 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8018139719 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.8181818182 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774022455026 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387318798774 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453266008298 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705297446727 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546814414195 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.