The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from
1983 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The percentages of power generating in a nation by six various sources: hydropower, oil, nuclear power, coal, natural gas, were given by two pie charts, namely 1983 and 2003.
At first glance, it is clear that there was an unfairly distrubtion for electricity production in both 1983 and 2003, especially from oil. However, in the duration of two decades, noticeable was that except for oil and hydropower, the rest of producing methods rose significantly.
In 1983, oill was the dominant with nearly hafl of the total at 42%. In close places were coal and nuclear power, capturing nearly a four at 23% and 20%. The remaining 15% of power was produced by using hydro power and natural gas, with the figures being 11% and 4% respectively.
Twenty years later, in 2003, both nuclear power and natural gas had a positive trend to reach almost one-four of the total. Conversely, even the first place of power production was still oil, there was a slight fall by 5% to 38%. Similarly, power from coal witnessed a dramatical drop with the proportion being 13%. Surprisingly, hydro power was still remaining in the time given.
In summary, it seemed that nuclear power and natural gas gradually replaced the dominant of oil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 61
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspapers will remain an important source of new for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 67
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 43
- Describe a time you were sleepy but had to stay awake You should say When it was Why you had to stay awake How you kept yourself awake And explain how you felt about it 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...afl of the total at 42%. In close place were coal and nuclear power, capturing nearl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'oiled'.
Suggestion: oiled
...rst place of power production was still oil, there was a slightly fall by 5% to 38%...
^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...wer production was still oil, there was a slightly fall by 5% to 38%. Similarly, power from coa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...%. Similarly, power from coal witnessed a dramatically drop with the proportion being 13%. Surprisi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, similarly, so, still, except for, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91787439614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6756918617 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4409189626 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5454545455 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0722293179235 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319885183145 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307676129551 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447258122923 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282949252253 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.