The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.

The given pie charts illustrate information about the average consumption of four types of food in the world in 2008. The charts also show a further comparison with other two countries, including China and India.

As an overall trend, the proportion of processed food made up to the biggest section in all three charts, despite two countries show the different pattern from the world average.

In particular, processed food consumption was the highest part of the world data, accounting for 41%, which was followed by 29% of vegetables and fruits and 26% of animal food. Only 4% consisted for nuts and seeds consumption.

In detail, China and India presented processed food as the main part of consumption, showing 34% and 39% respectively. Likewise, the percentage of vegetables and fruits held the second place in both countries at 32% and 23% each. There was 27% for animal food in China, exceeding number of the same group in India, which had only 15%.Whereas the smallest group of consumed food in India was nuts and seeds at 11%, in China, it was19%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-02-12 Thira 73 view
2018-02-11 Thira 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...same group in India, which had only 15%.Whereas the smallest group of consumed food in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and seeds at 11%, in China, it was19%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, second, so, whereas, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95530726257 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69052274534 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0383961015 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32077195659 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132629375646 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970479988357 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196716142561 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124997859596 0.0819641961636 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.