The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the average household spending on five vital categories in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Overall, It is clear that the average household expenditure differed from each category in both nations. However, householders in both countries spent the highest proportion of their income on 3 same categories - housing, food and other goods and services.
In Malaysia, housing saw the highest amount of spending's householders, represented 34% of total expenditure. This was higher than in Japan, only 21% of Japan householders' income. In Japan, 29% of total expenditure spent on other good and services, making it the highest among the categories and slightly higher than that of Malaysia, at 26%. Regarding food, there were similar figures in both countries, at 27% in Malaysia and 14% in Japan.
In terms of the other two categories, the average household expenditures in Japan were double than in Malaysia. Japanese household spent 20% of their income on food, compared with 10% that of Malaysia householders. Health care accounted for only 6% of total expenditure in Japan households, while 3% of that saw in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009. 78
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups UK 1990 52
- the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not writing a report 87
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92461905893 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1286688864 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417324360626 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176269551536 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141602060626 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293775457606 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15921998656 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.