The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The presented pie charts compare information about the percentage of budget that a family spends to different types of items classified into housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services, in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that in Japan, the major proportion of money was allocated for other goods and services, whilst that of money in Malaysia was spent on domestic costs. Moreover, expended money in terms of health care was comprised the minimal share of the total budget in both countries.
When observing the first chart in more detail, the most significant amount of money was paid for other goods and service by Japanese, which comprised almost less than a third, and food sector, approximately a quarter of total budget. While nearly the similar percentage of money was spend on housing and transporting (merely 20%), the least that of money was responsible to health care purposes at 6%.
Turning to the second chart description, the contribution of expended money in terms of the food expenditure was as high as other goods and services with standing at 27% and 26%, respectively. In comparison, money paid to domestic activities was responsible almost a third of all expenses, but just below 5% were comprised for health care. Besides, transportation costs were only 10% of total budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 78
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 84
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 284, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...rly the similar percentage of money was spend on housing and transporting merely 20%,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17040358744 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78344242448 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.928386129 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.125 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102583307729 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047592112957 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561851657583 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785363528934 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602807546316 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.