The illustration gives information about the changes in the proportion of cost of a school in Britain in three separate years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, the spending in insurance rises gradually throughout the period shown. The cost of other workers’ salaries falls steadily over a period of 20 years, while other spending in teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment and resources show a fluctuated trend.
In 1981, there was 40% of total school spending for salaries of teachers. The figure for teachers’ salaries reached to peak (50%) in 1991, and then dropped to 45% in 2001. By contrast, the expenditure in salaries of other workers decreased from 28% in 1991 to 22% in 1991, falling further to 15% in 2001.
The spending in insurance first rose from 2% in 1981 to 3% in 1991, climbing peak at 8% in 2001. Meanwhile, the figure for resources accounted for 15% as same as that for furniture and equipment. In the year 1991, the number of resources jumped to 20% and plummeted to 9% in 2001. However, the expenditure for furniture and equipment increased dramatically from 5% in 1991 to 23% in 2001.
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.(Study Sample) 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 87
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89847715736 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8895066855 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5320741977 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285946740426 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121528375802 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698858110011 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174412514696 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706959113995 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.