The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World.
It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and California, more water used in homes than on Industry and Agriculture. However, in the world, water is mainly used for agriculture.
In San Diego Country and California, residential water usage accounts for 60% and 39%, respectively, but there’s only 8% the total water usage globally goes for home use. On the other hand, agricultural water consumption shows contrast tendency. On a global scale, 69% of water is used in agriculture. California, however, spends only 28%, and the agricultural water proportion in San Diego is only 17%.
Unlike the other two values, the Industrial water usage of the three regions shows no significant difference. The percentage of the water used for industrial purposes in California is 33%, with 23% spent in San Diego and worldwide.
The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World.
It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and California, more water used in homes than on Industry and Agriculture. However, in the world, water is mainly used for agriculture.
In San Diego Country and California, residential water usage accounts for 60% and 39%, respectively, but there’s only 8% the total water usage globally goes for home use. On the other hand, agricultural water consumption shows contrast tendency. On a global scale, 69% of water is used in agriculture. California, however, spends only 28%, and the agricultural water proportion in San Diego is only 17%.
Unlike the other two values, the Industrial water usage of the three regions shows no significant difference. The percentage of the water used for industrial purposes in California is 33%, with 23% spent in San Diego and worldwide.
- The pie charts above demonstrate the responses to a questionnaire asking 100 Customers to the Parkway hotel on how they favored its service.It is clear that within only 5 years from 2005 the hotel had showed shown greater results with more and more Visito 84
- The table shows the average length of YouTube video advertisements by sector and average length of time viewers spent watching these advertisements The average length of the advertisements varied from a low of 21 8 seconds for pharmaceuticals to a high of 78
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go 73
- This table gives information about the forest area in some parts of the world for 15 years from 1995 to 2005.It is clear from the table that millions of hectares of land to be used to plant forest all over the regions, but it is tending to decline.In 1990 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25149700599 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97892004686 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497005988024 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.420827685 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.724731525157 0.215688989381 336% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312195192028 0.103423049105 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185717872763 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.519786390857 0.15604864568 333% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167037614338 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.