The line chart above gives us difference between world food and oil costs from 2000 to 2011.
Generally, both food and oil prices increased steadily at the beginning of the period and picked up from 2008 to 2009. But only food price reaches top in 2011, otherwise, oil price was lower than its highest point.
Between 2000 and 2004, the oil price did not change too much, even decreased in the middle. It did not grow as fast as the other price.
The line chart above gives us difference between world food and oil costs from 2000 to 2011.
Generally, both food and oil prices increased steadily at the beginning of the period and picked up from 2008 to 2009. But only food price reaches top in 2011, otherwise, oil price was lower than its highest point.
Between 2000 and 2004, the oil price did not change too much, even decreased in the middle. It did not grow as fast as the other price.
- The line chart above gives us difference between world food and oil costs from 2000 to 2011. Generally, both food and oil prices increased steadily at the beginning of the period and picked up from 2008 to 2009. But only food price reaches top in 2011, ot 22
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- he line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 while 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above gives us difference between world...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 368.0 965.302439024 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 82.0 196.424390244 42% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48780487805 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.00921669843 3.73543355544 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02394940836 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 59.0 106.607317073 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.719512195122 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 101.7 283.868780488 36% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4899979584 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.750836098367 0.215688989381 348% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.356760735161 0.103423049105 345% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.231914314285 0.0843802449381 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.465006018587 0.15604864568 298% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.227172039084 0.0819641961636 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.