The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie graph compares the changes of five different energy sources from 1995 to 2005 in France.
It is apparent that, there was a substantial increase with the nuclear energy and other energy productions while petrol has decreased. Meanwhile, the gas and coals were remained as the dominant energy sources in France.
Nuclear energy and other energy sources showed the relatively incremental whereas petrol experienced a decline. Nuclear energy rose with its production by 4.6% whereas other energy sources rose by 4.2%. Meanwhile, petrol production decreased substantially from 29.27% in 1995 to 19.55% by 2005.
About similar rates of energy were produced by Gas and Coal in both years, with the slight amount of coal was produced. Energy produced by coal comprised of 29.80% in 1995 and this increased a slightly by about just 1% to 30.93% in 2005. Similarly, 29.63% of gas was generated in 1995 and which rose to 30.31% by 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- The table shows source of student income over a five-year period in the United States. Write a report for a college lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- The chart below shows the amount of sales for four different kinds of foods in supermarkets in four different cities in America. 61
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing population. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 31
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 61
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'similarly', 'so', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271186440678 0.268076937826 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.129943502825 0.116061578633 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0621468926554 0.0759168565197 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.045197740113 0.0366838410393 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0112994350282 0.0131127313244 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16384180791 0.155750635184 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0395480225989 0.0379272487307 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5945520072 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225988700565 0.0210936926555 107% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0677966101695 0.0948980150116 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00564971751412 0.00967000014798 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 938.0 1161.00487805 81% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.9 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09090909091 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409090909091 0.337110787985 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25974025974 0.247514529752 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175324675325 0.171178102325 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116883116883 0.112407865282 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5945520072 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 41.9556531291 49.3433353143 85% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1111111111 23.0094962315 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.1269767716 42.9750493124 40% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 135.714022679 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 23.0094962315 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 43.0851370851 47.7609492067 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.54545454545 2.94281807926 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32204795467 0.418131533498 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.205081757261 0.181151798455 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.120499461069 0.0850326197045 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.701835431794 0.706616315825 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139451184711 0.157042692854 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161751224615 0.228904883108 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102992842449 0.108899403657 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.28693297376 0.367819155151 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.039682236697 0.0812612215331 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234030600298 0.316326947829 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995035024017 0.0921553760075 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.