The two plans illustrate the arrangement in an art gallery in 2005 and at the present. Overall, most of the changes are witnessed in the left half of the ground floor, while the remaining half stays unchanged.
Start from the entrance, the first improvement is the introduction of a ramp for those who use wheelchairs, along with the steps, instead of steps only in 2005. A small change can be seen in the entrance hall, where a rectangular desk was replaced by an oval one. Occupied by the exhibition 1, 2 and 3 in 2005, the right-handed part of the gallery experience no change thus far.
Look at the picture in more detail, the exhibition 4 existed in 2005 has been converted into an interactive area for children in the lower-left corner of the room and a smaller room for temporary exhibitions. The café and shop in the upper-left corner of the floor were renovated into a gallery shop, with vending machines installed outside the shop.
In 2005, the only way to access the upper floor was steps, but another choice has been now added, with the installation of the lift next to the stairs
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 87
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 95
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63076923077 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68786446545 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9270093384 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129715957896 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602957587654 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586890729088 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080070870622 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525582105334 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.