The plan below shows the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map compares the layout of a sports centre in 2 timelines ( present and future) of a university.
Overall, it can be seen that there are plenty of changes in this sports center. The most significant feature is the development of the 2 outdoor courts and the interpolation of various kinds of sport facility.
It is clear that the 25m pool and the next to changing room, seating, and reception remain unchanged. The good news for gymers is that the gym zone will be expanded to the East, near the 2 dance studios and sports hall planned to replace the East outdoor courts.
Moreover, the West outdoor courts are torn down and the leisure pool is the replacement. The noticeable extension is that both East and West corners are used to build more sports and convenient facilities. 2 changing rooms are constructed in the corners, and a café shop and sports shop are opened up in 2 sites of the reception.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | trikhung777 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | minhhieule2903 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | kidwish123 | 11 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Ieltsbg | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | kevann | 73 | view |
- The plan below shows the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...layout of a sports centre in 2 timelines present and future of a university. Ove...
^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... opened up in 2 sites of the reception.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62551117819 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9788318106 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107970245565 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043716484912 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359516066198 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699390338733 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279467115814 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.