The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The given line graph illustrates the amount of money spent on books in four European countries, namely France, Italy, Germany, and Austria over a period of 10 years starting from 1995.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of money spent on books in all mentioned countries saw an upward trend over the period shown. Moreover, the figure for Germany was highest.
There was a slight rise of 10 million dollars in the amount of money spent on books in Germany from 1995 to 1999. In contrast, it dropped slowly from 1999 to 2003 and then in terms of 2005, a rapid rise was witnessed. On the other hand, in France, there was no fluctuation, the amount of money spent on books went up slightly by 30 million dollars during a 10-year period, starting from 1995.
In Italy, the amount of money spent on books rose consecutively from 50 million to 55 million dollars from 1995 to 1997 although the year 1999 witnessed a slow decrease of 10 million dollars. Then a slight rise was seen from 1999 to 2005. It can be seen that in terms of France, the year 1999 witnessed a slight rise of 10 million dollars in the amount of money spent on books. Then, although it stayed unchanged until 2001, with significant growth of 30 million was seen in the amount of money spent on books over a period of four years, starting from 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | view | |
| 2023-06-06 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | khanhlyly | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 67
- The plan below shows the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, it dropped slowly from 1999 to 2003 and then in terms of 2005, a rapid rise ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50622406639 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30095614932 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423236514523 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3669154223 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280328412802 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140545328091 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789420101754 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208002628864 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382282425345 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, it dropped slowly from 1999 to 2003 and then in terms of 2005, a rapid rise ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50622406639 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30095614932 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423236514523 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3669154223 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280328412802 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140545328091 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789420101754 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208002628864 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382282425345 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.