Plan A shows a health center in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
The given plans show the changes of a health center from 2005 to the present day. Overall, during the surveyed period, the health center underwent some major renovations in terms of size and facilities.
The health center prior to changes had a car park which can hold up to 12 cars. This has been expanded all the way up the west side of the building in order to make room for 18 more spaces. The entrance has also been relocated to the left of the building, opening to the children's play area, which was not present in 2005, as well as the reception desk. The number of consulting rooms has been increased from 3 to 4, which all locate along the southeast side of the center. Another feature of this newly renovated health center is the addition of a minor operations room, occupying the vacant land beside the physiotherapy room in 2005. On the other hand, some facilities are still kept in the same place as they were in 2005, such as the physiotherapy room, the office, and the garden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Max Ryan | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Alex Christian | 67 | view |
- The map shows the ground floor of a library in 2001 and 2009 73
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 68
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52222222222 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39559781451 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0594188613 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30173877003 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13420847083 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181906077646 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278164562053 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140864560834 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.