The diagrams below show how a park in a city changed over time.
The diagrams give information on the changes of a park in a city in the past and the present.
Overall, the park underwent some major alterations including the addition of other recreational areas and the elimination of existing features.
In the past, the park had 2 major on-land areas, separated by a footpath encircling the park. In one area facing the houses across the footpath, there was a variety of trees planted, whereas, in the other area, people then could spend some time in a cafe while looking out to a boating lake with flower beds nearby as decorations.
At the present time, the overall layout of the park remains the same but with the newly added function to the existing footpath as people now could also use it as a cycle path. The lake now has been eliminated with the cafe being moved to the other area where trees were once abundant. In place of the lake, a swimming pool was installed with 2 tennis courts on one side and trees on the other. The area for trees was diminished to save some space for benches and a barbecue area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The chart gives information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 58
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal 80
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Plan A shows a health center in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56020942408 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42559291731 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0554533156 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127548170548 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723764123679 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978366339979 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119483785224 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111885043163 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.