The chart below shows the percentage of a drug company's total sales, by region, from 2002 to 2006.
The given chart provides information on the regional sales of a company specializing in medicines during the 4-year surveyed period, from 2002 to 2006.
Overall, the percentage of sales in Asia experienced a substantial rise throughout the years, whereas American medicine sales seemed to be on a downward trend.
In 2002, the total ratio of drug sales in Asia took up the least amount, at only 25%. However, in the next 4 years, this number gradually increased by 15% to finally reach the highest percentage of 40% in 2006.
America emerged in 2002 as the region which had the most potential in medicine sales with a total rate of 41%. This number experienced a steep decrease to hit an all-time low of 27% in 2004 before slightly rising by 2% to achieve an overall percentage of 30% in 2006.
The sales in Europe started in 2002 in the second place in terms of drug sales with the number of 34%. The ratio peaked first place in 2004 at 38% before dropping back slowly by 8% in 2006 to the same number as America's sales percentage.
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a large species of fish called the salmon. 78
- The maps show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, whereas, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52290601975 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4309727498 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376455393748 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155713471773 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862439954817 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200189920275 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771437826146 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.