The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and the plans also give a description of the proposed changes in future

Essay topics:

The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present-day and the plans also give a description of the proposed changes in future

The given picture illustrates the transformation that a particular area has undergone from 1965 to now and may take place in 2018.
As can be seen from the map, there have been several changes occurring, making the present-day area more residential than in the past. It is also proposed to continue to develop in the future.
The area has a river named Tam flowing from the south to the north within a branch running toward the west. In 1965, there was no connection between the western and eastern shore along the main river, however, they are linked by two bridges at present. In the north-west of the particular area which is along the river branch, all the trees found there in 1965 have been cleared to make way for a present-day car park. The city which can be found in 1965 on the other side of the branch has been intact now. At present, in the north of the main river, there has been an increase in the number of residences located in the north and the appearance of a footbridge in the south. In the future, a car park in the residential area will be constructed besides another one underneath the footbridge.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-07-27 dhpt12082003 73 view
Essays by user dhpt12082003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to continue to develop in the future. The area has a river named Tam flowing f...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, may, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52709359606 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53715145754 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8059093381 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209092331386 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865372610891 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536999930413 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159469828749 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494144314729 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.