The bar charts given provide a breakdown of how many hours per week industrial workers in four European nations, namely France, Denmark, Sweden, and the UK spent on their work in 2002.
As can be seen from the charts that apart from Franch, the number of workers in the other three countries who spent 36-40 hours was the largest.
The largest figure of French workers spent 31-35 hours per week on work, at exactly one-half of the total number, while in Denmark, Sweden, and the UK, the highest proportion of individuals work weekly 36-40 hours, accounting for 70%, 80%, and 50% respectively. In Denmark and Sweden, the proportion of people working from 31-35 hours each week obtained the second-largest rank, taking up almost a quarter and nearly one-third. The same position in France and the UK was the number of humans weekly spending 36-40 hours and over 50 hours, at around 35% and 40% respectively. There was a nearly 15% difference between the second position and the third one which was the group working 46-50 hours each week in France, while this figure in Sweden and the UK was just a tiny fraction.
The number of Danish workers who functioned 1-30 hours and from 41 to more than 50 hours per week occupied around 10%. This figure was rather similar to employees in France when it comes to people spending 1-14 hours, 21-30 hours, 41-45 hours, and above 50 hours each week on function, while it took well over one-tenth workers 15-20 hours to work. In Sweden, the total hours that precisely 20% of humans in the industry functioned were 15-30 hours per week. In other mentioned periods, just an insignificant minority of Swedish workers weekly spent 1-14 hours and 46 to more than 50 hours for their work. Regarding the UK, the figure for employees who worked from 1 to 45 hours (except for people working 36-40 hours) each week ranged from around 6% to nearly 15%.
It is clear that it took French industrial workers the least hours to function while Swedish ones spent most of their time behind working.
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea some think they should be banned Do you agree or disagree 78
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online Do you advantages of new development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and the plans also give a description of the proposed changes in future 73
- The following charts illustrate electronic gaming trends in South Korea in 2006 The first outlines the gamer age groups and gender demographics The second indicates game type preference 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, third, well, while, apart from, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 352.0 196.424390244 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74431818182 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30779060337 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460227272727 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.333653845 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130239890028 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693212182833 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462917741027 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944737940633 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582895216956 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.