The plans below show the ground floor of a library in 2001 and how it was redeveloped in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps demonstrate how changes of a library in the ground floor from 2001 to the its redevelopment in 2009.
Overall, while stairs and librarian's desk were remained unchanged over 8 years; the other facilities were rebuilt or redeveloped into another purposes.
On the top of the floor, the fiction part were changed into tables with a bigger size. The children's area next to that tables were opened in 2009. In the top-left side of this library, a history category was separated into three different parts, there were kitchen, economics and laws. On the right-top side of this building, a films & DVDs were replaced from an old Newspaper & Periodicals in 2001.
On the bottom of this floor, the self-part's, history's and fiction's room were resized into the smaller one and placed in the right-bottom corner of the library. In the center of this building, the tables were resized into the 4 bigger one. The computers room were built next to the Films and DVDs category at the right side of the ground floor.
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...ibrary in the ground floor from 2001 to the its redevelopment in 2009. Overall, while ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a film' or simply 'films'?
Suggestion: a film; films
...On the right-top side of this building, a films & DVDs were replaced from an old Newspa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83815028902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55559570115 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8111712655 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109373573345 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060062526008 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827236149276 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103180666115 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108033416613 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.