The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment

The plans depict the modification taken place at the sports centre of a tertiary educational institution in the future.

Overall, the area will have witnessed significant changes after being finished, prominent of which is the expansion of the place courtesy of the decision to remove all outdoor facilities. Nevertheless, the vicinity of the 25m pool and the reception area in front of it will stay unchanged throughout the time.

As per the maps, two outdoor courts which aligned themselves with the sport are will be destroyed to make room for other accommodation. First and foremost, when coming in from the front door, users will see a newly built indoor café on the right-hand side and a sports shop on the other hand side. Moreover, next to the aforementioned small dining establishment will then be a new changing room as a substitution for the current long one integrated next to the 25m swimming pool.

From this point onward and heading to the northeastern part of the center, there will be a construction of two state-of-the-art dance studios adjacent to each other. In addition, there will be an erection of a sports hall oppositely facing those two rooms. Furthermore, there will also be an expansion to the gym at the end of the sports centre, which doubled the size of the one in-use now.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ddition, there will be an erection of a sports hall oppositely facing those two rooms....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...doubled the size of the one in-use now.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93243243243 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92951100654 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.246313927 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166529090382 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712037931611 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345387677347 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103247802106 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252657655322 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.