The maps compare the current layout of Grange Park with that of 1920 when it first opened.
It is clear that there have been significant changes in the overall layout, with new places in the park.
The park has two entrances, one facing Arnold Avenue and the other Eldon street. Currently, a new underground car park has been built to the southeast of the park. In the middle of the park, a rose garden with four seats facing all directions overtakes the place of a fountain built in 1920. To the north of the rose garden, an amphitheatre for concerts which has been upgraded from a stage for musicians can be observed.
Although 2 rose gardens and numerous seats could be seen around the stage in 1920, there is only one rose garden to the south of the amphitheatre today. In the northeast of the park, there were a rose garden and a pond with water plants in 1920, but nowadays, cafe and children’s play area can be found in those places. To the south of this area, a glasshouse from 1920 has been demolished to make room for a water feature.
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 100
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980 1990 and 2000 and the world s top exporters of fish in 2000 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51041666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39057393736 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2916370318 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166030438907 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817215212431 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511147136032 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116376302903 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444094844373 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.