the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The two plans illustrate some changes to a public park from 1920 until now.
Overall, this park experienced considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable different between the two plans is the erection of rose garden and the substitutions of amphitheatre for concerts.
As can be seen from the plans, the fountain was destroyed to make a way for rose garden in the central with many seats put around. Beside, the seats in 1920 disappear. it also should be noticed that in the west of the maps the demolition of stage for musicians resulted in the construction of amphitheatre for concerts. The water features in the east was built to replace glasshouse.
Turning to the all the features, we can see from the plans that the pond for water plants was knocked down and replaced by children's area in the east. it can be noticed that by now there are an entrance underground car park but the rose garden in the southwest was destroyed.
- City dwellers seldom socialize with their neighbors today and the sense of community has been lost. Why has this happened and how to solve this problem? 56
- the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 61
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 52
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 56
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d. Beside, the seats in 1920 disappear. it also should be noticed that in the west...
^^
Line 9, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...concerts. The water features in the east was built to replace glasshouse. T...
^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...replaced by childrens area in the east. it can be noticed that by now there are an...
^^
Line 13, column 220, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'parks'?
Suggestion: parks
...w there are an entrance underground car park but the rose garden in the southwest wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83734939759 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70666344409 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6487665805 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132408760518 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648421648809 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773014679884 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112475933129 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896354224099 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.