The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.

The plans show the changes have been made around the Grange Park between 1920 and today.

Overall, it is clear that there have been several changes, the Fountain situated in the middle park and the Stage for musicians located in the left of the park are removed. Also, the new Water feature was constructed in the right of the park.

Looking at the plans more closely, one can see that the rose gardens of the northeast and the southwest are moved into the centre of the park except for the northwest rose garden. Likewise, the seats situated at the end of the north and south are shifted in the middle of the park. In addition, the Musicians stage has been replaced with the Amphitheatre for concerts. Moreover, the Pond for water plants was taken over the Children’s play area. Finally, the glasshouse does not exist any longer, the new entrance for car parking has been constructed underground.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-30 BOB_9717 73 view
2021-11-08 Elahe Rasooli 73 view
2021-04-24 Naheer 67 view
2021-04-24 mangpahang 11 view
2020-09-16 bsarker 78 view
Essays by user bsarker :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77070063694 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38582436421 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5087015732 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157516113318 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714835472977 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833164085859 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146870359014 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095058277078 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77070063694 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38582436421 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5087015732 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157516113318 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714835472977 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833164085859 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146870359014 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095058277078 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.