The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.
The plans show the alterations took place in Grange Park from 1920 to present.
Overall, by comparing the two plans we can be aware that the public park has witnessed significant changes throughout the period which include replacement of some buildings with entertainment places, removing some facilities and adding new ones. However, there are some exceptions untouched entrances for example.
In 1920, there was a fountain in the middle of the park with a stage for musicians on the left side of it. In the north-east part of the park a big pond was available for water plants. By 1920 there had been three rose gardens in the different side of the park with some seats for people. Two entrances were also constructed for the Arnold Avenue in the north and for the Eldon Street in the south. While entering from the Eldon Street there was a glasshouse with seats.
Looking at the current layout of the park considerable changes can be seen compared to the past. The fountain has been replaced with a rose garden with sitting place around it. Furthermore, large amphitheatre has been built in place of the stage. In the northeast side of the park one of the rose garden and the pond has been replaced with cafe and play area for children respectively. Water feature has been added instead of the glasshouse with extra entrance and underground car park in the southeast of the park. Other two main entrances have remained without alterations along with one rose garden which is situated in the northwest side of the Grange Park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-30 | BOB_9717 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | Elahe Rasooli | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | Naheer | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | mangpahang | 11 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | bsarker | 78 | view |
- Graph 78
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- In spite of the advances made in agricultire many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The plans show the alterations took plac...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in Grange Park from 1920 to present. Overall, by comparing the two plans we c...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions untouched entrances for example. In 1920, there was a fountain in the mid...
^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and for the Eldon Street in the south. While entering from the Eldon Street there wa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eet there was a glasshouse with seats. Looking at the current layout of the par...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56081897985 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503787878788 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4548441549 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134317394993 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548056374444 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622384416792 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115221333065 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710487335506 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The plans show the alterations took plac...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in Grange Park from 1920 to present. Overall, by comparing the two plans we c...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions untouched entrances for example. In 1920, there was a fountain in the mid...
^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and for the Eldon Street in the south. While entering from the Eldon Street there wa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eet there was a glasshouse with seats. Looking at the current layout of the par...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56081897985 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503787878788 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4548441549 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134317394993 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548056374444 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622384416792 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115221333065 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710487335506 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.