The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the transformations of Grand Park on the Arnold Avenue compared with 1920.
Overall, the Grand Park was tremendously developed specially to improve the means of recreational activity and add some food facilities. Also, the underground parking lot was constructed what alleviated drivers with looking for appropriate parking place near the garden.
First of all, instead of three previous gardens those were situated in the south-west, north-west and north-east corners constructors decided to leave only north-western ones. The most dramatical change is that fountain located in the center of the park in 1920 gave way to the new squared unite rose garden, which is rounded by seats. What about another water attractions, the territory of pound with water plants was occupied by the children’s play area, nevertheless nowadays, builders have erected revitalised water feature just to the right from the south gate. Besides these changes, stage for musicians underwent substantial renovations and was converted into the huge half-rounded amphitheater for concerts. And new café appears adjacent to the children’ play area to recharge their batteries in time.
To sum up, the Grand park has experienced dramatical changes and has become several times convenient and revitalised.
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fatures and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, look, so, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59898477157 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9926516374 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700507614213 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9854362786 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.272727273 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11726033215 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426594710846 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410213302556 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08267938263 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265727019927 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.