The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagrams illustrate the differences of Arnold avenue in Grand park between the first opening in 1920 and nowadays.
In general, when the society starts updating new styles, everything changes as well, including the park which has various diversity in dozens of ages.
First, in the center of the park, there used to be a fountain or entrances in the north and south of it, but that water decoration is now replaced by a rose garden as well as surrounded by seats. Despite that, at the amphitheater for concerts position today, the performers used to play on a stage for musicians which was built in Eastern style. Near that stage in the past, they reconstructed 2 rose gardens while nowadays there is only 1 left and seats next to them were also removed.
In the east of the avenue, there are some significant improvements. Instead of building something similar to the past such as a rose garden, a pond for water plants, a glasshouse with some seats nearby, the managers of the park decided to replace them with a cafe, a playground for children, a water feature respectively. Furthermore, the park now has an underground car park whose entrance is located at the position that the seats used to be.
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Austalian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selcting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75355450237 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72260753885 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616113744076 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3371210724 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151028121905 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645987703947 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542262979806 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10077773853 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417544931701 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.