The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
The plans illustrate how much Southwest Airport will change after reconstruction in a year. Overall, there will be a significant development in features of the new airport. Furthermore, the redeveloped airport will be more accessible and will have many more gates.
Regarding the access, the airport which at present has one gate for each departures and arrivals, will have two gates for each after the development. At the left side of the gate for departures, there will be a cafe which will be relocated from the north east of the departure room. Next to the cafe, there will be a new feature, bag drop, replacing check in point which is the moved to the opposite, where the cafe is located now.
The security, passport control, and customs locations for departures and arrivals will stay the same. After the security there will be shops along the way to the sky train, which will be available after development. People who are now using walkway, will be able to use sky train to reach the gates they are heading to. The number of the gates will be also added to over double, from just 8 in the current airport to 18 in the new one. The size of this area will be enlarged in Y-shape, to the north east and the north west.
Finally, in the arrival room will be another new cafe and ATM at the right side and next to it there will be an extension of the building for the last new facility, a car hire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
... walkway, will be able to use sky train to reach the gates they are heading to. The numb...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 1.00243902439 1596% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51171875 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45719892115 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50390625 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4325468824 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240343674524 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108790245428 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728937124861 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168852851044 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780148061378 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.